Home / dating for funksjonshemmede / Psychological dating violence

Psychological dating violence

By using the 4-level measure of DVV, after adjusting for covariates, sexual DVV only (a PR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.21–2.12) and both physical and sexual DVV (a PR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.26–2.17) were positively associated with NUMPD among boys, whereas among girls, physical DVV only (a PR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.16–1.75) and both physical and sexual DVV (a PR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.03–1.99) were positively associated with NMUPD.CONCLUSIONS: NMUPD was associated with experiences of DVV among both male and female students.

As such, with this study we address the gap in literature by analyzing data from a nationally representative sample of US high school students to investigate the association between NMUPD and physical and sexual DVV.BACKGROUND: Little information is available on the associations between nonmedical use of prescription drugs (NMUPD) and dating violence victimization (DVV) among high school students and how associations vary by sex.METHODS: We used data from the 2015 national Youth Risk Behavior Survey, a cross-sectional survey of a nationally representative sample of students in grades 9 to 12.Understanding the impact of this epidemic on adolescents is necessary to guide prevention efforts for this population.In the 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, a household survey, it is estimated that nearly 6% of 12- to 17-year-olds misused prescription psychotherapeutic drugs in the past year, whereas in the school-based Monitoring the Future survey, it is reported that a higher annual prevalence of 12.0% among 12th-graders misused prescription psychotherapeutic drugs during the same time period.NMUPD was associated with dating violence, but the association between types of dating violence and NMUPD varied by the sex of the student.Nonmedical use of prescription drugs (NMUPD) (that is, using a prescription medication without a prescription or in a manner that is unintended, particularly opioids) has reached epidemic proportions in the United States.For example, a nationally representative study of adolescents 12 to 17 years old found physical or sexual assault (regardless of dating context) was not associated with past year NMUPD.With the relatively high prevalence of both NMUPD and DVV among adolescents and the negative outcomes independently associated with both of these experiences, it is important to explore the potential relationship between NMUPD and DVV.The sample was restricted to students who dated during the 12 months before the survey, resulting in a sample of 5136 boys and 5307 girls.Sex-stratified logistic regression models estimated adjusted prevalence ratios (a PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between lifetime NMUPD and DVV.

956 comments

  1. Psychosocial Factors Associated with Reports of Physical Dating Violence Victimization among U. S. Adolescent Males

  2. Existing literature indicates that acceptance of dating violence is a significant and robust risk factor for psychological dating abuse perpetration. Past work also.

  3. Dating violence is physical, sexual, emotional, or verbal abuse from a romantic or sexual partner. It happens to women of all races and ethnicities.

  4. Dating Violence is the physical, sexual, psychological, or emotional violence within a dating relationship, including stalking. It can occur in person

  5. Definition Edit. Teen dating violence is defined as the physical, sexual, psychological, or emotional violence within a dating relationship. According to the Centers.

  6. Physical abuse, but also emotional, sexual, or psychological abuse. Although. who your teen is dating. that would be considered dating violence.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*